Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Natural justice: natural justice is an expression for a philosophical or theological justification of legal principles as opposed to a human implementation of law by constitutional, i.e. democratically legitimate, organs. See also right, laws, society, history._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jürgen Habermas on Natural Justice - Dictionary of Arguments
III 278 Natural Law/Habermas: the emergence of rational natural law cannot be explained solely by the ethical rationalization of world views. >Worldviews/Weber. It depends to a large extent on the development of science and requires an analysis of the relationship between cognitive and moral-practical components of the world view. >Science, >Progress, >Morality, >Thinking, >Knowledge. HabermasVsWeber, Max: Weber neglects this aspect._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Ha I J. Habermas Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne Frankfurt 1988 Ha III Jürgen Habermas Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. I Frankfurt/M. 1981 Ha IV Jürgen Habermas Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. II Frankfurt/M. 1981 |
||
> Counter arguments against Habermas
> Counter arguments in relation to Natural Justice
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-28